THE STORY OF BABEL

Stumbleupon Review

    THE STORY OF BABEL:

    In the beginning there was only one kind of Mathematician,
    created by the Great Mathamatical Spirit form the Book: the
    Topologist. And they grew to large numbers and prospered.

    One day they looked up in the heavens and desired to reach up
    as far as the eye could see. So they set out in building a
    Mathematical edifice that was to reach up as far as “up” went.
    Further and further up they went … until one night the edifice
    collapsed under the weight of paradox.

    The following morning saw only rubble where there once was a huge
    structure reaching to the heavens. One by one, the Mathematicians
    climbed out from under the rubble. It was a miracle that nobody was
    killed; but when they began to speak to one another, SUPRISE of all
    suprises! they could not understand each other. They all spoke
    different languages. They all fought amongst themselves and each went
    about their own way. To this day the Topologists remain the original
    Mathematicians.


    - adapted from an American Indian legend
    of the Mound Of Babel
Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

The great logician Betrand

Stumbleupon Review

    The great logician Betrand Russell (or was it A.N. Whitehead?)
    once claimed that he could prove anything if given that 1+1=1.

    So one day, some smarty-pants asked him, “Ok. Prove that
    you’re the Pope.”

    He thought for a while and proclaimed, “I am one. The Pope
    is one. Therefore, the Pope and I are one.”

Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

Three men are in a hot-

Stumbleupon Review

    Three men are in a hot-air balloon. Soon, they find themselves lost in a canyon somewhere. One of the three men says, “I’ve got an idea. We can call for help in this canyon and the echo will carry our voices far.”

    So he leans over the basket and yells out, “Helllloooooo!
    Where are we?” (They hear the echo several times).

    15 minutes later, they hear this echoing voice: “Helllloooooo!
    You’re lost!!”

    One of the men says, “That must have been a mathematician.”

    Puzzled, one of the other men asks, “Why do you say that?” The reply: “For three reasons.

    (1) he took a long time to answer,
    (2) he was absolutely correct, and
    (3) his answer was absolutely useless.”

Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

Here’s a limerick I picked

Stumbleupon Review

    Here’s a limerick I picked up off the net a few years back – looks better on paper.


    3^(1/3)
    /
    | 2 3 x 3.14 3_
    | z dz x cos( ----------) = ln (\/e )
    | 9
    /
    1

    Which, of course, translates to:

    Integral z-squared dz

    from 1 to the cube root of 3

    times the cosine

    of three pi over 9

    equals log of the cube root of ‘e’.

    And it’s correct, too.

    Doug Walker, SAS Institute

    Corrected by Joshua P. Gruber

Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

There was a mad scientist (

Stumbleupon Review

    There was a mad scientist ( a mad …social… scientist ) who kidnapped
    three colleagues, an engineer, a physicist, and a mathematician, and locked
    each of them in seperate cells with plenty of canned food and water but no
    can opener.

    A month later, returning, the mad scientist went to the engineer’s cell and
    found it long empty. The engineer had constructed a can opener from pocket
    trash, used aluminum shavings and dried sugar to make an explosive, and
    escaped.

    The physicist had worked out the angle necessary to knock the lids off the tin
    cans by throwing them against the wall. She was developing a good pitching arm
    and a new quantum theory.

    The mathematician had stacked the unopened cans into a surprising solution to
    the kissing problem; his dessicated corpse was propped calmly against a wall,
    and this was inscribed on the floor in blood:

      Theorem: If I can’t open these cans, I’ll die.

      Proof: assume the opposite…

Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

Moebius always does it on

Stumbleupon Review

    Moebius always does it on the same side.

    Heisenberg might have slept here.

Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Algebraic symbols are used

Stumbleupon Review

    “Algebraic symbols are used when you do not know what you are talking
    about.”
Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

Q: Why did the mathematician

Stumbleupon Review

    Q: Why did the mathematician name his dog “Cauchy”?

    A: Because he left a residue at every pole.

    Q: Why is it that the more accuracy you demand from an interpolation
    function, the more expensive it becomes to compute?

    A: That’s the Law of Spline Demand.

Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

Q: What’s purple and

Stumbleupon Review

    Q: What’s purple and commutes?

    A: An abelian grape.

    Q: What’s yellow, and equivalent to the Axiom of Choice?

    A: Zorn’s Lemon.

Posted in Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

Lightbulb Jokes

  • How many mathematicians does it take to replace a lightbulb (1)?

    Ten: One to do it and eight to watch.

  • How many mathematicians does it take to replace a lightbulb (2)?

    One: He gives it to six Californians, thereby solves the problem by
    reducing it to a previous joke.

  • How many mathematicians does it take to replace a lightbulb (3)?

    The answer is intuitively obvious.

  • How many mathematicians does it take to replace a lightbulb (4)?

    None. It’s left to the reader as an exercise.

  • How many mathematical logicians does it take to replace a
    lightbulb?

    None: They can’t do it, but they can prove that it can be done.

  • How many numerical analysts does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    3.9967: (after six iterations).

  • How many classical geometers does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    None: You can’t do it with a straight edge and a compass.

  • How many constructivist mathematicians does it take to replace a
    lightbulb?

    None: They do not believe in infinitesimal rotations.

  • How many simulationists does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    Infinity: Each one builds a fully validated model, but the light
    actually never goes on.

  • How many topologists does it take to change a lightbulb (1)?

    Just one. But what will you do with the doughnut?

  • How many topologists does it take to change a lightbulb (2)?

    It really doesn’t matter, since they’d rather knot.

  • How many analysts does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

    Three: One to prove existence, one to prove uniqueness and one to
    derive a nonconstructive algorithm to do it.

  • How many functions does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    The integral of f: But that’s not definite.

  • How many real functions does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    None: It’s too complex for them.

  • How many Bourbakists does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    Changing a lightbulb is a special case of a more general theorem
    concerning the maintainence and repair of an electrical system. To
    establish upper and lower bounds for the number of personnel
    required, we must determine whether the sufficient conditions of
    Lemma 2.1 (Availability of personnel) and those of Corollary 2.3.55
    (Motivation of personnel) apply. Iff these conditions are met,
    we derive the result by an application of the theorems in Section
    3.1123. The resulting upper bound is, of course, a result in an
    abstract measure space, in the weak-* topology.

  • How many professors does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    One: With eight research students, two programmers, three post-docs
    and a secretary to help him.

  • How many university lecturers does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    Four: One to do it and three to co-author the paper.

  • How many graduate students does it take to replace a lightbulb?

    Only one: But it takes nine years.

Posted in Humour | Leave a comment