The blood of Dresden – Times Online

Ξ January 24th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |







    Dresden, a beautiful city, built in the art spirit, symbol of an admirable heritage, so antiNazi that Hitler visited it but twice during his whole reign, food and hospital centre so bitterly needed now -- ploughed under and salt strewn in the furrows.

    There can be no doubt that the allies fought on the side of right and the Germans and Japanese on the side of wrong. World war two was fought for near-holy motives. But I stand convinced that the brand of justice in which we dealt, wholesale bombings of civilian populations, was blasphemous. That the enemy did it first has nothing to do with the moral problem. What I saw of our air war, as the European conflict neared an end, had the earmarks of being an irrational war for war's sake. Soft citizens of the American democracy had learnt to kick a man below the belt and make the bastard scream.

    The occupying Russians, when they discovered that we were Americans, embraced us and congratulated us on the complete desolation our planes had wrought. We accepted their congratulations with good grace and proper modesty, but I felt then as I feel now, that I would have given my life to save Dresden for the world's generations to come. That is how everyone should feel about every city on earth.


    "I believe that it should have been even stronger! Dresden! Dresden! The extermination of a city!" - Reserve Colonel Yoav Gal, an Israeli Air Force pilot, on Army Radio during, and about, "Operation Cast Lead" (11 January 2009)

 

YouTube – DISPOSABLE HEROES OF HIPHOPRISY – Television

Ξ January 24th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |


Television. I luvs it.

YouTube Preview Image

 

Amazon.com: The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to…

Ξ January 24th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |


With the application of relentless logic Macpherson illustrates, and in some cases shores up, the postulates of Hobbes, Harrington, the Levellers, and Locke. Primarily he shows that their epistemological basis is overgeneralised, and that they really only hold for the type of system they elaborate, thus begging the question somewhat.

He ends by noting that whilst the Liberalism of Hobbes and Locke et al. did hold for the most part at the time they conceived it, and indeed up until quite recently, once the voting franchise was allowed to those without sufficient means to support themselves without recourse to the alienation of their labour then Liberalism becomes self-contradictory. The class divided society that is an inevitable result of Liberalism can only support the type of government necessary for the maintenance of a possessive individualist market society as long as the franchise is limited to that (owning) class who have sufficient class cohesion and common cause in its continuance.

He also got Leo Strauss's back up.

It's all good.

 

YouTube – The Crystal Cube 1/4

Ξ January 23rd, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |


...

YouTube Preview Image

 

Kranzbergs laws of technology – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ξ January 20th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |


    Melvin Kranzberg's six laws of technology state:

    1st - Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.

    2nd - Invention is the mother of necessity.

    3rd - Technology comes in packages, big and small.

    4th - Although technology might be a prime element in many public issues, nontechnical factors take precedence in technology-policy decisions.

    5th - All history is relevant, but the history of technology is the most relevant.

    6th - Technology is a very human activity - and so is the history of technology.

 

Home

Ξ January 19th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Parapluie, Photography |





5 Umbrellas - Pamela Viola

 

Figurative Art

Ξ January 17th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |

Stumbleupon Review of : http://www.cliffwarner.co.uk/




Cliff Warner

 

44 presidents coming

Ξ January 17th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |

Stumbleupon Review of : http://www.44presidentscoming.com/



Just like Beautiful-Agony.com. But with drawings--of U.S. presidents.

If you visit one site that makes you want to tear the imagination centres of your brain out through your eye-sockets this year, visit this one!

 

Wow, fiction works!—By Colson Whitehead (Harpers Magazine)

Ξ January 17th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |


    The bookstores are too full today of writers who have nothing to say. If there is nothing at stake for the characters, then nothing can be at stake for the reader. The writer of fiction must embrace a moral vision, or else he is little more than a cheap Fleet Street haberdasher. I decided early on that the work of Saul Bellow was an exemplar of this aesthetic imperative. You will recall the famous opening sentence of good old Augie:

    I am an American, Chicago born--Chicago, that somber city--and go at things as I have taught myself, free-style, and will make the record in my own way: first to knock, first admitted.

    There it is in all its Bellovian glory, the bluster and bombast! Can you smell it? The musk of a virile sentence drawing blood into itself? It is about to spread the labia of mediocrity and rut with the ineffable. We could all do worse than to write like Saul Bellow. And when I say write like Saul Bellow, I mean be Saul Bellow. And when I say be Saul Bellow, I mean unzip the skin from his body and wear it as a sort of Saul Bellow suit so that we can get cozy in it and truly inhabit it and understand the Old Macher. Except he is dead. And he was quite short, so your ankles and wrists would poke out of the flesh suit as if you were some ruddy-cheeked schoolboy who has outgrown his uniform, grimly trudging home from the elementary school and dreaming that one day you will write and be free from all these dullards and their cruel jibes

    Where was I?"

 

Sherlock Holmes and case of the climate bandwagon & Greenfyre’s

Ξ January 16th, 2009 | → 0 Comments | ∇ Uncategorized |